Power-to-weight ratioHigher is betterCalculated from peak power and curb weight — figures quoted against a different weight basis (e.g. dry or DIN) will differ.
251.6 hp/t✓ BestCalculated
211.4 hp/tCalculated
Acceleration
0–60 mphLower is betterRollout (1ft) handling differs between testers and manufacturers.
Fuel economy (combined)Lower L/100km is better; higher mpg is better — direction is on the canonical L/100km.
—
90.0 mpgHomologation · US EPA
Fuel economy (city)Lower L/100km is better; higher mpg is better — direction is on the canonical L/100km.
—
95.0 mpgHomologation · US EPA
Fuel economy (highway)Lower L/100km is better; higher mpg is better — direction is on the canonical L/100km.
—
85.0 mpgHomologation · US EPA
Electric System
Battery usable capacity
—
91.0 kWhManufacturer claim · Ford
EPA rangeHigher is better
306 mi✓ BestHomologation · US EPA
280 miHomologation · US EPA
Peak DC charging power
250 kWManufacturer claim · Tesla
—
Energy consumptionLower is better
198.7 Wh/km✓ BestHomologation · US EPA
232.3 Wh/kmHomologation · US EPA
Practicality
Cargo volumeHigher is better
76 ft³✓ BestManufacturer claim · Tesla
30 ft³Manufacturer claim · Ford
Seats
5Manufacturer claim · Tesla
5Manufacturer claim · Ford
Pricing
Base price (as tested market)Demo prices only; not live FX.
$57,490Independent test · Kelley Blue Book
$53,395Homologation · US EPA
Every figure is the car’s preferred, sourced value. “Best” marks the strongest value in a row, judged on the canonical measurement (so a winner is correct whichever unit system you view). Open a car to see each value’s source, original units, and alternates.
Community index
Spotted a missing or incorrect figure?
Add a value with its source. An editor verifies every submission against its citation before it appears on the site.