Loading…
Loading…
Compare
Compare 2–4 cars side by side. Every figure is sourced; the best value in each comparable row is marked.
| Specification | Audi2026 Audi Q4 45 e-tron | Ford2026 Ford Mustang Mach-E GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ||
| Top speedHigher is better | 99 mphManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 124 mphBestHomologation · Michigan State Police |
| Power-to-weight ratioHigher is betterCalculated from peak power and curb weight — figures quoted against a different weight basis (e.g. dry or DIN) will differ. | 133.0 hp/tCalculated | 211.4 hp/tBestCalculated |
| Acceleration | ||
| 0–60 mphLower is betterRollout (1ft) handling differs between testers and manufacturers. | 6.30 sManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 3.80 sBestManufacturer claim · Ford |
| 0–100 km/hLower is better | 6.60 sManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 4.00 sBestManufacturer claim · Ford |
| Engine & Powertrain | ||
| Peak powerHigher is better | 282 hpManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 480 hpBestManufacturer claim · Ford |
| Peak torqueHigher is better | 402 lb-ftManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 600 lb-ftBestManufacturer claim · Ford |
| Engine layout | ElectricManufacturer claim · Audi of America | ElectricManufacturer claim · Ford |
| Induction type | ElectricManufacturer claim · Audi of America | ElectricManufacturer claim · Ford |
| Transmission type | — | Single-speedHomologation · US EPA |
| Number of gears | — | 1Homologation · US EPA |
| Weight | ||
| Curb weightLower is better | 4674 lbBestManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 5006 lbHomologation · US EPA |
| Fuel Economy | ||
| Fuel economy (combined)Higher is betterLower L/100km is better; higher mpg is better — direction is on the canonical L/100km. | 115.0 mpgBestHomologation · US EPA | 90.0 mpgHomologation · US EPA |
| Fuel economy (city)Higher is betterLower L/100km is better; higher mpg is better — direction is on the canonical L/100km. | 125.0 mpgBestHomologation · US EPA | 95.0 mpgHomologation · US EPA |
| Fuel economy (highway)Higher is betterLower L/100km is better; higher mpg is better — direction is on the canonical L/100km. | 104.0 mpgBestHomologation · US EPA | 85.0 mpgHomologation · US EPA |
| Electric System | ||
| Battery gross capacity | 82.0 kWhManufacturer claim · Audi of America | — |
| Battery usable capacityHigher is better | 77.0 kWhManufacturer claim · Audi of America | 91.0 kWhBestManufacturer claim · Ford |
| EPA rangeHigher is better | 288 miBestHomologation · US EPA | 280 miHomologation · US EPA |
| 10–80% charge time | 28 minManufacturer claim · Audi of America | — |
| Energy consumption | — | 232.3 Wh/kmHomologation · US EPA |
| Practicality | ||
| Cargo volume | — | 30 ft³Manufacturer claim · Ford |
| Seats | — | 5Manufacturer claim · Ford |
| Pricing | ||
| Base price (as tested market)Demo prices only; not live FX. | $50,600Manufacturer claim · Audi of America | $53,395Homologation · US EPA |
Every figure is the car’s preferred, sourced value. “Best” marks the strongest value in a row, judged on the canonical measurement (so a winner is correct whichever unit system you view). Open a car to see each value’s source, original units, and alternates.
Community index
Add a value with its source. An editor verifies every submission against its citation before it appears on the site.